The Lincoln Electric Spark

Frank Koller has written a most thought-provoking book entitled Spark: How Old-Fashioned Values Drive a Twenty-First Century Corporation.

Lincoln Electric, a manufacturing company in Cleveland, Ohio rejects normal North American business practice by refusing to lay off its employees in tough times. The company’s century-long record of profitability and innovation is proof that trust, flexibility and fairness can inspire people to achieve amazing things when they are confident that their future – and that of their families – is secure.

He uses the Lincoln Electric story in a wide-ranging critique of current American management practices and the value system underlying American business.  He homes in on the widespread attitude that layoffs are now seen as an everyday technique of modern management and are an almost instinctive reaction to corporate downturns.

His account could be seen as a reasonable description of the paradox that Lincoln Electric’s ‘old fashioned values’ that have produced success are so often rejected by most modern businesses.  However his analysis could perhaps have gone a little deeper.

The key label attached to the Lincoln Electric approach is that it has a no-layoff policy.  Koller downrates this by describing it as reflecting old-fashioned values.  This naturally is anathema to the average big business CEO, who would like to be seen as:

  • producing short term results fast
  • action-oriented
  • tough-minded

The advantage of instituting lay-offs when results are dropping is that it looks as though it confirms that the CEO ‘is not afraid’ to do what it takes.

The Lincoln Electric approach could have better been described as the timeless set of best practices, rather than just the ‘old-fashioned’ way of doing things.  Homing in on only the no-layoff practice provides only a caricature of what Lincoln Electric is all about.

Lincoln Electric has a set of 6 core values and non of them refer to a no-layoff practice.  Here is a very short summary of these values and you will see that they are very much now-values rather than just old-fashioned ones.

  1. Be customer-centric
  2. Value your team
  3. Reward Performance
  4. Be financially prudent
  5. Respect the environment
  6. Support local communities

Most businessmen would support these six values.  However many would not list them in this order which I believe is very much an order of priority.  Only by applying these values in a tough-minded way will success he achieved.

  • Clearly #1 is that the customer will perceive above all else that the company will do its utmost to meet their expectations and fulfill their needs.
  • The team is equally important and management must develop a climate of mutual respect and mutual commitment.
  • #3 is the lever by which this climate is maintained and enhanced.  It is not solely rewarding the good performers but ensuring that unsatisfactory performance is identified and corrected.  This may mean that some team members who are not willing to pull their weight will be shown the door.

The remaining three values are clearly important too.  They are very necessary for a successful company.  However they are not sufficient in themselves to ensure success.  That only comes from a strong commitment to the first three values.

The staff are very much a key asset for any company.  Real success comes from making assets perform rather than getting rid of assets.

In fact getting rid of human assets generates costs rather than bringing in revenues.  The biggest cost is the alienation that everyone in the organization feels as they note that anyone is expendable.  Rather than everyone putting out 100% of effort to satisfy customers, part of that time is spent in polishing up their resumes and seeing what other opportunities may exist in the marketplace.

Usually also there will be cash costs in termination packages or redundancy arrangements for those who are let go.  These are rarely mentioned in the PR releases as the firings are announced.  However a true accounting might well show little net benefit when all is taken into account.

Lincoln Electric is all about a very different way of managing enterprises.  It may well be too tough a challenge for those Wall Street quick-fix merchants.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It

It suddenly struck me today how much the phrase, If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, is customer-centric. Your current customers, particularly if they are repeat buyers, are a valuable asset. Handled right, they can represent significant future potential profits.

The incident that triggered the thought was that my news feed aggregator service, Bloglines, added a new look and functionality. To each news feed item, it now adds at the right-hand end a column of possible related search terms you might wish to explore with Ask. The problem it creates is that I wish to see as many news items on the screen line-by-line as I can. This allows me to scan many more items and I rely on the Titles to determine whether they need to be perused. Now with each item taking up a space five times as high I have only one fifth of the productivity. You might assume that there would be a button that would allow me to switch off this unwanted extra service. Not so. It seems impossible to return to the classic simple look.

I tried to get some information on a way to correct the situation via Twitter. Someone with the username Bloglines did suggest I use a Firefox Addon to change the style. It was partially successful but I never managed to get back to the original simplicity. Reluctantly I have now switched to Google Reader, which with a little manipulation gives me close to what I want. I have been a long time Bloglines user and it is only with the greatest reluctance that I made the switch.

The counter view on these matters was one that Tom Peters suggested, and there is even a book about it now. If it Ain’t Broke…Break It!: And Other Unconventional Wisdom for a Changing Business World (Paperback) by Robert J. Kriegel and Louis Patler.

Being product directed is often said to be the reverse of being customer centric and this really sums it up. Microsoft is an extreme example of this ‘Break It’ approach with its constant upgrades. Overall they may make more money this way, but they leave behind them a trail of disgruntled customers. When something does exactly what the customer wants, it takes a lot to have them accept that they need the product or service to be changed. If it ain’t broke, please don’t fix it.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Company Strategy – Who Determines It?

Do You Know Your Company Strategy?

The Harvard Business Review in April asked, Can You Say What Your Strategy Is? The authors, David J. Collis and Michael G. Rukstad, suggested:

Most executives cannot articulate the objective, scope, and advantage of their business in a simple statement. If they can’t, neither can anyone else. If they can summarize their company’s strategy in 35 words or less, would their colleagues put it the same way?

It is our experience that very few executives can honestly answer these simple questions in the affirmative. And the companies that those executives work for are often the most successful in their industry.

If your company has no strategy, who should determine what it is? Some might say this is a no-brainer question. Clearly the leader, the CEO, is the one who must set strategy.

Strategy resources for the CEO

If the CEO accepts it is her/his responsibility, where can they turn to for help? Google suggests one such resource, the CEO Refresher, with its tagline, brain food for business!

There you will find 41 articles offering different perspectives on the best way of determining company strategy. Bear in mind that they define company strategy as follows:

Competitive Strategy is the ‘relentless pursuit of victory’ and topics include strategic thinking, competitiveness, innovation, execution, critical thinking, positioning, and the art of warfare.

Clearly company strategy is akin to the process whereby a general may best direct his troops to win the war. Given that generals have not always had great successes, just think of the Charge of the Light Brigade, you might question whether this is enough.

Strategy Consultants

Perhaps to get a wider perspective, one might think of bringing in a consultant. The most respected strategy consultant is Michael E. Porter. One of his most widely read papers is How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. A few quotes will serve to outline his position:

Awareness of these competitive forces can help a company stake out a position in its industry that is less vulnerable to attack

The essence of strategy formulation is coping with competition.

Competition is not manifested only in the other players. Rather, competition in an industry is rooted in its underlying economics, and competitive forces exist that go well beyond the established combatants in a particular industry. Customers, suppliers, potential entrants, and substitute products are all competitors that may be more or less prominent or active depending on the industry.

So it would appear that strategy still concerns itself with conflict, but the leader must be aware that this conflict is taking place in a very complex world.

Other gurus have suggested this warlike approach is too limited a view. INSEAD professors W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne have proposed that strategy is concerned more with exploration. They favor a Blue Ocean Strategy in a very popular business book:

Blue Ocean Strategy challenges companies to break out of the red ocean of bloody competition by creating uncontested market space that makes the competition irrelevant. Instead of dividing up existing–and often shrinking–demand and benchmarking competitors, blue ocean strategy is about growing demand and breaking away from the competition.

Using as examples Cirque du Soleil, Starbucks, Southwest Airlines, CNN, FedEx, and Bloomberg, Kim and Mauborgne illustrate the value of redefining problems in new and different ways; ways not typical in traditional and entrenched marketing and management strategy. Here is how they distinguish between blue and red oceans:

Red oceans represent all the industries in existence today. This is the known market space. Blue oceans denote all the industries not in existence today. This is the unknown market space. Blue oceans are defined by untapped market space, demand creation, and the opportunity for highly profitable growth. Although some blue oceans are created well beyond existing industry boundaries, most are created from within red oceans by expanding existing industry boundaries. … In blue oceans, competition is irrelevant because the rules of the game are waiting to be set.

Even this Blue Ocean Strategy assumes that the leader chooses a direction after surveying the marketplace. The leader is in control. The troops need marching orders. Clearly the leader should determine strategy.

An alternative approach to company strategy

What determines a good company strategy? Clearly it should be the basis for strong and sustainable company growth. That only arises when the company’s products and services are seen by prospective purchasers as superior to competitive offerings. This suggests that the best person to confirm that a strategy is successful may be that prospect who is reviewing possible suppliers. Provided there are enough prospects in the market niche, then there is potential for success. A strategy must therefore be chosen so that the prospect feels that their needs will be best met by the company. With this approach it is the prospect who determines the strategy.

This is of course a re-statement of the call to be customer-centric rather than product-driven. In rational discussion, it would seem to be unarguable that this is a better way to go. Yet in practice it so often is not the way that company strategies are determined. Perhaps it’s a hangover from the view that strategy should really be determined by The Art of War. That may appeal to a leader’s instincts, and it’s often said it’s lonely at the top. However that instinctive approach may not result in the best company strategy.

Related:
Client-Centric Marketing Plans
Michael Porter on Strategy

Technorati Tags: , , , ,