<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Comments And Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html</link>
	<description>Canadian views on the online business world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D. Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/comment-page-1#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D. Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otherbb.com/?p=1244#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>PageRank is a fun, yet stressful, subject. By the time we think we get things half way figured out Google changes the play book. 

I picture them all at a big conference table watching a meter that indicates how close everyone is. When too many are getting close they hit the button that changes the rules. Then they all have a big laugh. Perhaps I&#039;m just not getting enough sleep lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PageRank is a fun, yet stressful, subject. By the time we think we get things half way figured out Google changes the play book. </p>
<p>I picture them all at a big conference table watching a meter that indicates how close everyone is. When too many are getting close they hit the button that changes the rules. Then they all have a big laugh. Perhaps I&#8217;m just not getting enough sleep lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/comment-page-1#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otherbb.com/?p=1244#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>Good thought, Stephen. I much prefer long scrolling pages than having to click from page to page.  For that reason, I don&#039;t like the - more - approach to avoiding duplicate problems between the blog home page and single post pages.  Those who don&#039;t have my concern will find your suggestion useful.

BTW I use the All-in-one-SEO Pack Plugin and noted recently that it is now inserting the canonical tag. Others may not have noted that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thought, Stephen. I much prefer long scrolling pages than having to click from page to page.  For that reason, I don&#8217;t like the &#8211; more &#8211; approach to avoiding duplicate problems between the blog home page and single post pages.  Those who don&#8217;t have my concern will find your suggestion useful.</p>
<p>BTW I use the All-in-one-SEO Pack Plugin and noted recently that it is now inserting the canonical tag. Others may not have noted that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Cronin</title>
		<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/comment-page-1#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otherbb.com/?p=1244#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>Hi Barry,

You appear to use WordPress 2.8. It supports paged comments. Why not get your theme updated to use this feature, then only allow 10 comments per page (using one of the SEO plugins that adds the canonical tag to avoid duplicate content issues)? 

Wouldn&#039;t that solve the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barry,</p>
<p>You appear to use WordPress 2.8. It supports paged comments. Why not get your theme updated to use this feature, then only allow 10 comments per page (using one of the SEO plugins that adds the canonical tag to avoid duplicate content issues)? </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t that solve the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/comment-page-1#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otherbb.com/?p=1244#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>David, nofollow, etc. only affects how PageRank flows out to other web pages.  It does not affect the inherent PageRank of the particular web page.

Matt Cutts PageRank Sculpting post today seems to confirm this approach. It all links to my Null Hypothesis view of PageRank:
http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2009/06/pagerank-calculation-null-hypothesis/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, nofollow, etc. only affects how PageRank flows out to other web pages.  It does not affect the inherent PageRank of the particular web page.</p>
<p>Matt Cutts PageRank Sculpting post today seems to confirm this approach. It all links to my Null Hypothesis view of PageRank:<br />
<a href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2009/06/pagerank-calculation-null-hypothesis/">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2009/06/pagerank-calculation-null-hypothesis/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/comment-page-1#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otherbb.com/?p=1244#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how far common sense will get someone in the pagerank game, but here goes.

It seems to me that if using nofollow as a method of preventing all the valuable rank leaking out to the websites of people who comment no longer works

 - in other words,  that every comment with a link to the commentor’s website constitutes a leak - 

then Google must be looking beyond nofollow, otherwise popular blogs with lots of comments would lose pagerank immediately.

And I haven&#039;t heard that that has happened.

I wrote that here 

http://ragbag.comluv.com/2009/06/10/nofollow-dofollow-and-whyfollow/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how far common sense will get someone in the pagerank game, but here goes.</p>
<p>It seems to me that if using nofollow as a method of preventing all the valuable rank leaking out to the websites of people who comment no longer works</p>
<p> &#8211; in other words,  that every comment with a link to the commentor’s website constitutes a leak &#8211; </p>
<p>then Google must be looking beyond nofollow, otherwise popular blogs with lots of comments would lose pagerank immediately.</p>
<p>And I haven&#8217;t heard that that has happened.</p>
<p>I wrote that here </p>
<p><a href="http://ragbag.comluv.com/2009/06/10/nofollow-dofollow-and-whyfollow/">http://ragbag.comluv.com/2009/06/10/nofollow-dofollow-and-whyfollow/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jet Aircraft Charter</title>
		<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/comment-page-1#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Jet Aircraft Charter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otherbb.com/?p=1244#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>This is one of those topics that is worth pondering, but being overly attentive to every nuance is not necessary for most bloggers/web masters.  Sticking to the basics and working the longtail with basic on-page and off-page factors will get the job done.  Only major sites of many thousands of uniques per day should worry about working the bleeding edge of SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those topics that is worth pondering, but being overly attentive to every nuance is not necessary for most bloggers/web masters.  Sticking to the basics and working the longtail with basic on-page and off-page factors will get the job done.  Only major sites of many thousands of uniques per day should worry about working the bleeding edge of SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kikolani</title>
		<link>http://www.otherbb.com/2009/06/blog-comments-and-google.html/comment-page-1#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Kikolani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otherbb.com/?p=1244#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s possible to receive good comments after a long period of time.  It seems like bloggers who attract hundreds of comments per article would be getting in trouble for something that most blogs welcome. 

Would paginated comments be helpful? That way each page would be limited to a certain number of outbound links.  Of course, I have heard that creates duplicate content issues as well.  Sticky subject!

~ Kristi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s possible to receive good comments after a long period of time.  It seems like bloggers who attract hundreds of comments per article would be getting in trouble for something that most blogs welcome. </p>
<p>Would paginated comments be helpful? That way each page would be limited to a certain number of outbound links.  Of course, I have heard that creates duplicate content issues as well.  Sticky subject!</p>
<p>~ Kristi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

